Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jackson Ford's avatar

“And together the Jewish state and the free republic did what the old world could not: they stopped evil in its tracks.” History may not determinatively repeat itself, but it can have parallels. (Insert Churchill’s speech after Dunkirk here). Whatever else is wrong about Netanyahu and Trump, both of them certainly deserve applause for their moral clarity and action on this issue. Netanyahu was the Churchill sounding the sirens for two plus decades. Trump answered the call. Make no mistake that no two countries maintain enough sense of a proper moral compass to have done this other than Israel and America.

Expand full comment
Ignacio Grimoldi Stengel's avatar

Israel’s strikes, while arguably defensive, should’ve come from a voluntary, non-coercive system, not a statist one.

The U.S. involvement was wholly unjustified, lacking a direct threat and resting on the same collectivist myth of “national interest” that Objectivism rejects.

Governments aren’t moral agents, individuals are. A true Objectivist would condemn both states’ coercive structures while recognizing Israel’s right to self-defense, ideally through private means.

It is hard to morally defend a coercive state such as Israels on this morally justifiable action when domestically it enforces mandatory conscription, high taxes (e.g., 48% top income tax rate), and regulatory overreach (e.g., centralized healthcare).

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts